Monday, December 29, 2008

Homestyle Popcorn Pop Secret Calories

Archbishop Tutu: "Israel's air raid on Gaza is a war crime"
















Israeli shelling on Gaza - Photo notiziedalmediooriente.it

The Israeli air strikes on Gaza have all the characteristics of war crimes. " , said the Nobel Prize for Peace, Msgr. Desmond Tutu . "In the context of a total air supremacy, in which part of the war unfolds against lethal air forces adversaries who can not defend, assume all of the bombing war crimes "- said the Anglican Archbishop, according to which the military offensive" does not contribute to the security of Israel. "Archbishop Tutu has finally highlighted the responsibilities of international community and especially of world leaders "in the last 60 years have constantly failed with the people of Palestine and Israel."

Amnesty International denounces the Israeli offensive in Gaza that has already caused over 280 deaths the Palestinian population in one of the bloodiest attacks in the forty years of Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. "The use disproportionate use of force by Israel is illegal and liable to trigger violence Other details in the whole region "- the press reports of Amnesty . " Hundreds of unarmed civilians and police personnel who did not participate in hostilities are among the victims the Israeli bombardment "- adds the association. Amnesty also states that" the continued firing of rockets on Israeli towns and villages by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups - which according to the Association share the responsibility for the escalation of violence - are illegal and can not be justified. "The Association therefore calls on all parties to put an end to the attacks and the community International "intervene immediately to ensure that civilians trapped in the violence are protected and that the blockade of Gaza is removed."

"It is absolutely necessary to stop the bombing because they are already too many innocent victims. We condemn all violence: the rockets fired from the Gaza Strip, but today's bombing. So there will only further spiral of violence. We are saddened that yet Once that is the only language of weapons "- says Claudette Habash, director of Caritas Jerusalem in an appeal taken by the Italian Caritas which for years has supported the most vulnerable population in the Gaza Strip.

were numerous yesterday expressions of condemnation and protests in front of the Israeli embassy attacks and solidarity for the victims and for the tormented people of Gaza not only in the Arab world, Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Syria and Yemen, but also in various European capitals including Stockholm, Copenhagen, London, Madrid, Istanbul, Rome and Milan in Milan - Misna agency reported - the protesters staged a march which started from Piazza San Babila, where banners have been linked anti -Israel, and has reached the Piazza Duomo, then praying for the victims of Gaza and for Peace in the knee.

The missionary news agency in the world highlights the comment of the pressure group Israeli peace " Gush Shalom (Peace Block) founded by former Israeli parliamentary Uri Avnery. In a statement released by e-mail pacifist the association states that "The war in Gaza, the bloodshed, killings, destruction and suffering on both sides of the border have the perverse folly of a bankrupt government. A government that is carried away by military adventurers, and a crude nationalist demagoguery and pointless in a destructive war that will not give solution to any problem, nor for the communities in southern Israel under a rain of missiles, nor the terrible poverty and suffering of Gaza under siege. The day after the war, will remain the same problems - with the addition of many bereaved families, injured and disabled for life and piles of rubble and destruction. "

" The escalation to war could and should be avoided "- continues the statement Gush Shalom. "To break the truce with Israel was the raid carried out in a tunnel on the night of the American elections two months ago. Since then the army has been accumulating with escalation of fire raids and targeted killings, each time firing rockets at Israel fell. The cycle of the massacre could and should be broken. The cease-fire can be restored immediately and on a more solid. It is right to demand an end to Israel's total rocket its territory and its citizens, but must put an end to all their attacks and death by starvation of one million and a half residents of Gaza, even stopping to interfere with the right of Palestinians to choose their leaders. The declaration of Ehud Barak that would suspend campaigning to focus on the offensive in Gaza is a joke. The war in Gaza is in itself the campaign of Barak, a cynical attempt to buy votes with the blood and suffering of Sderot and Netivot, Gaza and Beit Hanun. "

According to a survey of the Israeli commercial television, the ' 82% of Israelis have expressed support for the operation of 'lead time' and the Labour Party, of which Defense Minister Ehud Barak has been president since June 2007, would rise in the forecast for any seats in parliament from 11 to 16 - emphasizes the director of the Misna , Pietro Mariano Benni. [GB]


Source: Unimondo.org

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Do Twins Have Vertebrae

December 12, 2008 to commemorate the massacre of State

While in Italy has been struggling with bad weather and the difficulty to make ends meet, while CGIL only mobilizes the world of work and the whole civil society into the streets to have appropriate measures to address the crisis passes under all these problems also yet another anniversary of the Massacre of State.



39 years have passed since that December 12, 1969 in Fountain Square, from the terrible massacre in the National Bank of Agriculture, which caused 17 deaths and 84 injured, were responsible for subversive organizations of the right, as demonstrated historically and procedurally.


SOURCE: www.reti-invisibili.net
Milan, December 12, 1969, 16:30

explodes a bomb in living branch of the National Bank of Agriculture, at 4 Fountain Square. Begins a new era of tragedy.

The terrorists could not have chosen a better time: the bank is in fact packed for the "Friday Market", which refers to the farmers in the provinces of Milan and Pavia. The bomb was placed to cause maximum casualties: under the table at the center of the room for customers, the semi in front of the doors. The rooms bear witness to the power of the explosive used devastated.

The attack because sixteen dead, of which fourteen on the spot, and eighty wounded. History will tell whether the massacre of Piazza Fontana, launching the strategy tension, resulted in the ten darkest years of Italian political life.

In the hours following the attacks are carried out searches in places of all organizations of the extreme left. It also visited some far-right organization, but without much conviction, as the investigation and save the New Order National Vanguard, the most important. Fin The very next day, as prepared in advance, part of an incredible campaign against the extremists on the left. The surveys are an amazing pace, is arrested in three days on which a dozen people, such as state police, "heavy burden clues." They are all anarchists Bakunin and circles of March 22. Among them are: John Aricò, Annelise Borth, Casile Angelo, Roberto Mander, Emilio Borghese, Mario Merlino, Giuseppe Pinelli and Pietro Valpreda. For the police, in short, in addition to the anarchic, no track deserves to be taken into account.

begin interrogation. Are conducted with energy. On December 15 at midnight in the courtyard of police headquarters in Milan, a shattered body with almost no noise at the foot of a journalist. And Giuseppe Pinelli, an anarchist arrested three days earlier, fell without a cry from a room on the fourth floor. Official cause of death: suicide. You would not believe anyone ... Among the anarchists stopped immediately after the massacre at the National Bank of Agriculture, Commissioner Calabresi seems to be interested in one person: Peter Valpreda, a professional dancer. The boy cries his innocence. It is recognized that not long after. Yet, even then, all of them reveal the existence of a "black run", which will be explored only belatedly.

December 15, 1969

Guido Lorenzon secretary of a section of the Christian Democrats, is a city attorney stating that he is aware of facts that could be linked to the attacks. Two days earlier, that the aftermath of the explosion, was the editor John Ventura (longtime friend), a conversation that, since then, the obsession. Information Ventura, which provided him with the attacks were so precise and detailed so that it may be totally unrelated to the massacre.

Previously Ventura had talked with the same precision of the ten train bombings carried out in Northern Italy in the night between 8 and 9 August 1969. It had also confided to belong to a clandestine organization that was planning a coup aimed at creating a system inspired by the Republic of Salò. Up to that moment had been silent Lorenzon. After the massacre in Milan could not do so: the last conversation with Ventura, in fact, seemed to understand that they were preparing other deadly attacks.

The next day, in the company of lawyers, Lorenzon repeated his testimony before a magistrate, from Treviso, the prosecutor Pietro Calogero. With the help of Lorenzon, who continues to attend Ventura, in a few weeks Calogero collect a series of solid evidence against him and his friend, Franco Freda, a lawyer well known in the region of Padua for its neo-Nazi views.

Franco Freda, slightly older than Ventura, a great admirer of Hitler and the SS, fanatical anti-Semite, worked its way up, like Ventura, MSI, in the early sixties he directed the university organization (Fuan ). Later he founded the Aryan aristocracy Groups (AR), close to New Order.

John Ventura grew up in the nostalgia for Mussolini, has run the MSI writing very young. In 1965, finding that movement too moderate, enter into the New Order, whose more energetic policy best suits their aspirations.

November 1971

A Mason, to perform some repairs on the roof of one house of Castelfranco Veneto, accidentally breaks the partition wall of a house owned by a Socialist town councilor, Giancarlo Marchesin, and discovered an arsenal of weapons and explosives, including, in particular, cases of ammunition initialed born. Arrested, Marchesin declares that those weapons were hidden there by John Ventura a few days after the attacks of 12 December, and that before you were at a certain Roger Pan.

questioned in turn, Pan reveals that during the summer of 1969, after the train bombings, Ventura asked him to buy the metal cases of the German brand Jewell. Those of wood used to place the explosives in the attacks, said the publisher had not had the effect of "compression of the explosive metal." Pan refused. The next day, noting Ventura from a metal box, he realized that someone was going to buy it for him.

Pan had forgotten the episode until 13 December 1969, the day when television and newspapers showed the playback of a cassette used in the attacks on banks. It was a Jewell, identical to those purchased by Freda and Ventura. The magistrates of Treviso

discover that the group held its meetings in the hall of a university of Padua made available to it by the keeper, Marco Pozzan, right-hand man Franco Freda.

Submitted by investigators, 21 February and 1 March 1972, two long interviews, Marco Pozzan explains that the plan, prepared for a long time, had received the green light during a night meeting held in Padua, April 18, 1969 . At first reticent about the identity of two of the participants in the meeting, arrived the same evening from Rome, Pozzan, after some hesitation, reveals the name of one of them, Pino Rauti, then head of the New Order movement. On the second, it ensures to know only what the Franco Freda said: "It is a journalist and member of the secret services ...".

The magistrates, indeed, were already aware of this meeting due to interception which had submitted the details of Freda. What I was unaware of the importance it had in the organization of the terrorist attacks of 1969.

March 3, 1972

Franco Freda, solicitor in Padua, John Ventura and Pino Rauti, national leader of the MSI and founder of the New Order, were arrested. They are accused of organizing the attacks of April 25, 1969 (the Fair and the Milan Central Station) and 8 and 9 August of that year (at the expense of some trains). On 21 March, adding to the charges against the group Freda-Ventura bombings of 12 December 1969, the court Stiz forward the dossier to local jurisdiction, the prosecutor in Milan.

to continue the investigation shall be appointed three new judges whose first initiative is set at liberty Rauti, without dropping the indictment.

Taking surveys from scratch, the three judges picked up in Milan a few months a series of decisive evidence against the group-Freda and Ventura, at the same time, demonstrate that police officers and judges who have fallen on the track anarchist who committed numerous irregularities .

A new report on the various pieces of explosives, timers and found bags containing the bombs at December 12, 1969 attacks can ascertain three important facts:

1) the bombs are made up of identical sticks of explosives hidden from Ventura, few days after the attacks, in the house of Giancarlo Marchesin;

2) the mechanisms of delayed blast bombs come from a lot of fifty timer purchased September 22, 1969 by Franco Freda in a shop in Bologna. Freda will tell magistrates that he bought the timers at the request of a mysterious Captain Hamid Mohamed Selin Algerian secret service, on behalf of the Palestinian resistance. A check carried out at Algerian authorities that this captain does not exist;

3) bags in which they found the bombs had been purchased two days before the attacks, in a leather goods of Padua. A few days later, by comparing two photos of the leather bag was discovered intact in the Italian Commercial Bank, Judge D'Ambrosio is a difference. In the first, taken the same evening of the attacks, still hangs from the handle the price tag. In the second, taken a month later, the label and the rope which was attached to have disappeared. Once again, someone intervened to suppress the evidence.

now convinced they have in hand, Franco Freda and Giovanni Ventura, the key characters of the attacks, Milan magistrates apply to find out who is behind the two men, the true underlying the strategy of tension. The investigation will be torn down in flight in 1974 from the decision of the Supreme Court to remove from their investigation of who ran for two years with exemplary courage. The trial was moved to Catanzaro, where they had already been moved to the investigation and trial Valpreda for "reasons of public order." A Catanzaro they are assigned to two local magistrates who, without being able to question their honesty, will never follow the "black tracks" with the stubbornness of their predecessors.

***

From: http://www.ecn.org/uenne/archivio/archivio2004/un10/art3164.html
(Nova Humanity, number 10 of March 21, 2004, Year 84 - article by Luciano Lanza)

's sentence appeal for the Piazza Fontana bombing (December 12, 1969) is not outrageous as many say and write, is the rule. Restored. After a few anomalies. Small and incomplete.

facts. On 12 March the Court of Appeal of Milan acquitted of the crime of murder (life imprisonment) Delphi Zorzi, Carlo Maria Maggi and Giancarlo Rognoni, which are responsible of the attack that caused more than 34 years ago 16 (plus one) dead and 84 wounded in National Bank for Agriculture. In June 2001 the three were sentenced to life imprisonment. In addition Stefano Tringali was caught three years for aiding and abetting. Ironically it is the only guilty by a sentence reduced to one year. But if there are guilty of aiding and abetting those who did? Mysteries of Italian justice. Or rather, there are no mysteries, there is only the desire to "close" a page which sees the Italian state as guilty of conspiracy and murder.

Why is the rule in this criminal affair? Very simple. Because since the outbreak of the bombs (one in Milan and two in Rome) the apparatus of state have done everything for detecting and concealing the truth. Remember? At first the monster that had put the bomb was an anarchist, Pietro Valpreda, but not only anarchist also a dancer, then a move, a different with the lust of blood and revolution. And from there a campaign (obsessively orchestrated, not too cleverly, but pounding by the media) against the anarchists and the left "revolutionary." With a side equally dramatic: the "flight" of a Milanese anarchist, Giuseppe Pinelli, from the fourth floor of police headquarters in Milan. Well that had worked for a short time frame, then an obscure court Veneto in Treviso, Giancarlo Stiz if they had come out with a warrant for the arrest of two neo-Nazis: Franco Freda and Giovanni Ventura. For Stiz were their leaders, not Valpreda of this assassination. Before

anomaly. Which contradicted the investigation "institutional" of Roman magistrates and Vittorio Ernesto Cudillo occurred. The two had bet now (and why?) Valpreda and his companions on the club March 22. From there, a sequence of processes that define a small thing is ridiculous. The process begins February 23 for the massacre that saw the dock and the anarchists Valpreda and his companions (with an addition of Mario Merlino, Nazi infiltrator in the group March 22) and the Nazis Freda and Ventura. The Sound of Music to muddy the waters (the worn, but still heralded theory of "extremists on both sides) and do not understand what really happened. But the Roman magistrates on March 6 (makers of the frame, remember: Occorso and Cudillo) understand that they will get it going. The process is then moved to Milan: the place of slaughter. The place where, according to the laws of the Italian state was to be held beginning the process. What's going on? The Prosecutor General of Milan, Enrico De Pepper says that Milan is a city in the hands of the "red" legitimate suspicion. The process is hijacked (banished?) In Catanzaro. But we have to wait almost ten years after the massacre (February 23, 1979 to get to the first sentence. Freda and Ventura are sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, acquitted Valpreda and companions (insufficient evidence), but convicted of criminal conspiracy. But there an interesting postscript. The courts of Catanzaro return to Milan acts regarding the former prime minister Giulio Andreotti and Mariano Rumor and former Mario Tanassi ministers, defense, and Mario Zagari, Justice. To say that the four men come almost immediately from the political process is how to tell one of those old jokes that everyone knows. And it all ends up as already expected, "Sorry to disturb."

And, from task to task, we arrive at January 27, 1987 in which the first section of the Supreme Court closed the matter: no one responsible for the massacre of Piazza Fontana. Anarchists and Nazis are innocent. Or rather, the fact remains that Freda and Ventura has confirmed the sentence to 15 years for attacks on the Trade Fair and the Central Station in Milan on April 25, 1969 and, in the same year, the train bombings (ten bombs, eight burst) between 8 and 9 August. Special

not insignificant: those two attacks, initially attributed to anarchists, were used to construct the "theorem anarchist" Piazza Fontana. Then the responsibility of the case is finally attributed to the Nazis no longer seems relevant.
dialectical capacity of the Italian judiciary.

arrive in another of the few anomalies that mark this event. The examining magistrate Guido Salvini in 1987 opened a new investigation sull'eversione and right on the Piazza Fontana massacre.

survey in 1995 in order to get indictments against a number of neo-Nazi terrorists. But to wait until June 2001 to assist the life sentence of Delphi Zorzi, Carlo Maria Maggi and Giancarlo Rognoni. Over the three-year sentence for aiding and Stefano Tringali.

Even the anomaly created by Salvini was closed. Buried by a desire to be guilty for the massacre. And when you have never seen a state that condemns himself?

Why the massacre of Piazza Fontana was really a massacre was termed as the anarchists Bridge Ghisolfa December 17, 1969 at a press conference that the press called it "incoherent". Massacre was involved because there are ministers, party secretaries, the Italian secret service (who are not diverted, but obedient to the orders of those responsible policy) and foreign intelligence services (Americans and Israelis).

For those who have lived through that period then it is worth recalling that the Italian ruling class feared a shift to the left of the national policy, a change unwanted and opposed by all means. Even with the bombs and the dead. It was put in place a strategy that "would lead, in the intentions of the performers, in an authoritarian regime, but which was run by the highest organs of state to take out political opponents and to create a climate of fear which perpetuates the centrality the Christian Democratic Party and its allies. "

Now, back to the fore the successors of the Christian Democrats (Forza Italy more satellites), the Piazza Fontana bombing must go into oblivion. Discuss this issue again in a few years, when nearly forty years have passed since the massacre. And then it will be even more and only a story. Revised. According to the dictates of revisionism abounds.

***

Association:
"Family Associations victims of the massacre of Piazza Fontana"
President: LOUIS PASS

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Where To Watch Free Bangbros Episodes

60th ANNIVERSARY OF THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS









Source: www.perlapace . it


Human Rights, the world celebrates, no Berlusconi

The 60th anniversary of the Declaration Paris snubbed from the right. The government has not yet implemented the International Criminal Court.
Careless. Commitments not implemented. Hiding. So the Italian government is going to not mention a deadline that will involve the whole world: the 60th anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights. An absence

guilty. An unjustified and unjustifiable disregard. Ten in December, the world celebrates the sixtieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: the "Magna Charta" of humanity, which for the first time recognized the fundamental rights of all human beings. Rights which continue to be violated, trampled, muddy in many parts of the planet. More reason to renew a commitment. To keep with the "diplomacy of the States' and the peoples. Ten in December: the Italian government latita. It is called out. Very low profile. Virtually non-existent. To complaints and Flavio Lotti, coordinator of the Table of Peace, an organization that promoted the National Committee for the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.




GOVERNMENT Fugitive
"Italy - said the fighting - and the only European country that has chosen to ignore the call UN's December 10, 2007 inaugurated the Year of Human Rights and called on all states to a more concrete commitment. " Call that the Italian government has largely rejected. "The fact - noted the coordinator of the Table of Peace - is even more serious because Italy is part of the UN Human Rights Council, the body that more than anyone else has the responsibility to defend and promote respect for human rights rights in the world. For this - concludes Lotti - Italy should be at the forefront among the countries that undertake more for human rights. " It should. Because the reality, unfortunately, is another. And the reality is about understatement, hallway, delaying the implementation of commitments made in international fora. Government at large. The proof is in the complaint of the radicals. "It is now 10 years after the approval of the Rome Statute by the Diplomatic Conference that established the International Criminal Court, and that is the first permanent institution with the mission to prosecute and try those responsible for some of the most serious crimes known to humanity such as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. "

THE CRIMINAL COURT CASE
to remember are the radical deputies elected from the lists of Pd, Rita Bernardini Mecacci and Matthew, then complaining the lack of implementation to date, by the Italian government of the Statute of the International Criminal Court. "Italy - Bernardini and continue Mecacci - was among the protagonists of that story through political and diplomatic efforts of governments, the center-right and center-left, because ours was the fourth country to ratify the Statute, thanks the tireless struggle of the Radical Party and No Peace Without Justice. " Yet today, Italy is still failing in implementing within the state, which means that it is not in a position to work from the legal point of view with the Court. One issue that - explain - as it continues to remain unresolved, could expose our country to step in our country of criminals wanted by the International Court, for example, which could not be delivered to it by our authorities. " A fugitive from a government to be counterbalanced by a grassroots mobilization of civil society associations and more engaged on issues of human rights in Italy and around the world: 221 initiatives in 159 cities in all Italian regions are the numbers of National Day Action for Human Rights, which next Wednesday, December 10, celebrated throughout Italy on the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, under the banner of the slogan "If do not defend them, you take them out. "

EVENTS
Duecentouno one hundred fifty-nine initiatives in the city, in all Italian regions are the numbers of the National Day of Action for Human Rights, on Wednesday December 10, celebrated throughout Italy on the sixtieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Humans. The highlight of the Day initiative, promoted by a cartel of associations and committees, will be held in front of the headquarters of the Directorate General of RAI in Rome on Viale Mazzini, a sit-in during which participants can listen to the reading of the Universal Declaration of 1948, the Italian Constitution and the service contract of public television: "Dear Rai - says the wheel of the organizers - we ask you to give voice to the voiceless. We ask you to enlighten people's lives and to defend their fundamental rights, whatever the color of their skin. We ask that you do every day. We do not ask much. We ask only that you do your duty as a public service. " Despite the disinterest of government.

Umberto De Giovannangeli
Source: December 4th, 2008 Unit

taken from www.perlapace.it


LINKS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT:

SITE CLUB UNESCO CUNEO

ARCHIVE peace human rights

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL ITALY

AMNESTY ITALY



The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1948.

The thirty articles that make enshrine individual rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural needs of each person. We also proclaim the right to life, liberty and personal security, to a treatment of equality before the law without discrimination, to a fair trial and the public, to be considered innocent until proven guilty, freedom of movement, thought , conscience and belief, freedom of opinion, expression and association. There is also proclaims that
no one can be enslaved or subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and that no one shall be arbitrarily arrested, imprisoned or exiled.
There are also states that everyone has the right to a nationality, to marry, to own property. to take part in the government of his country, to work, to receive fair compensation for work, to enjoy rest, leisure and to enjoy adequate living conditions and to receive an education. It also provides for the right of everyone to form and join a trade union or to seek asylum in case of persecution.

Many countries have summarized the terms of the Declaration by the constitution. It is a declaration of principles with an appeal to the individual and to every single social organization to promote and ensure respect for the freedoms and rights that are defined. The United Nations Member States were not required to ratify it (the declaration is not binding in itself), though belonging to the United Nations is generally regarded as an implicit acceptance of the principles of the Declaration.

should be noted that under the Charter of the United Nations Member States undertake to act jointly or individually, to promote universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms. This is an obligation of a legal nature. The authoritative statement is an indication of what are human rights and fundamental freedoms.

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Preamble

Considering that the recognition of the inherent dignity of all members of the human family of their rights and the equal and inalienable is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world;

Given disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of humanity and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the

Given that it is essential that human rights are protected by legal rules, if you want to avoid that man is compelled to have recourse as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression;

Given which is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Given the peoples of the United Nations in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Given that Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms;

Given that a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the utmost importance for the full realization of this pledge,

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration, strives to promote, through teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and these freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of the same States, and between those of the territories under their jurisdiction.

DECLARATION UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS


Article 1 All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2
1) Everyone is entitled to all rights and all freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, for reasons of race, color, sex, language, religion, of political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

2) No distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, international law of the country or territory to be independent, or subject to the trusteeship, non-self, or subject to any limitation of sovereignty.


Article 3 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.


Article 4 No one shall be held in slavery or servitude, slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in any form.

Article 5
No one shall be subjected to torture or treatment or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.


Article 6 Everyone has the right, at any place, in recognition of his legal status.


Article 7 All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by constitution or by law.

Article 9
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.


Article 10 Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and his obligations and of any criminal charge made to it.

Article 11
1) Everyone charged with a crime is presumed innocent until his guilt has been proven legally in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense .

2) No one shall be convicted of any act or omission which, at the time it was committed did not constitute a crime under domestic law or under international law. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than that applicable at the time the crime was committed.

Article 12
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home, correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to be protected by law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13
1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14
1) Everyone has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15
1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. 2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16
1) Men and women of full age have the right to marry and to found a family, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion. They have equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the state.

Article 17
1) Everyone has the right to own property alone or in community with others.

2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, this right includes freedom to change religion or belief, and freedom of expression either alone or in community with others and in public or private his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.


Article 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression including the right not to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless frontiers.


Article 20 Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21
1) Everyone has the right to participate in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

2) Everyone has the right to equal access to public service in his country.

3) The will of the people is the foundation of the government, this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal and secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.


Article 22 Everyone, as a member of society has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international cooperation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23
1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favorable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

4) Everyone has the right to form and join trade unions for the protection of his interests.


Article 24 Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable that limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25
1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26
1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. The Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

2) Education shall be directed to the full development of human personality and the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of United Nations peacekeeping.

3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27
1) Everyone has the right to participate freely in cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

2) Everyone has the right to protection of moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29
1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality.

2) In exercising its rights and its freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law to ensure the recognition and respect for human rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.


Article 30 Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of some of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.